Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


Background

Cervical nodal metastasis is the most important prognostic factor in patients with head and neck cancers. Unfortunately, nodal dissection at level IIb carries a risk of damage to the spinal accessory nerve. We aimed to determine the prevalence of level IIb metastasis and the relevance of nodal dissection at level IIb in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.

Methods

During neck dissection, level IIb lymph nodes obtained from 181 patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas were removed, processed, and histopathologically examined. All specimens were divided into two groups according to the side (affected and unaffected sides). The number of dissected lymph nodes and prevalence of level IIb metastasis in each group were then determined and compared according to the preoperative clinical N stage (cN0 and cN+).

Results

The study included 158 men and 23 women with a median age of 65 years (range, 17-89 years). The prevalence of pathologically confirmed level IIb metastasis was 0% for clinically node-negative (cN0) necks on the unaffected side and 10.34% for clinically node-positive necks (cN+), with an overall prevalence of 2.4%. There was a significant association between clinically determined and pathologically confirmed node negativity at level IIb.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that level IIb neck dissection in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas may be required only if preoperative examination reveals multilevel or level IIa metastasis or suspicious level IIb metastasis.

References 


Articles referenced by this article (19)


Show 9 more references (10 of 19)

Citations & impact 


Impact metrics

Jump to Citations

Citations of article over time

Smart citations by scite.ai
Smart citations by scite.ai include citation statements extracted from the full text of the citing article. The number of the statements may be higher than the number of citations provided by EuropePMC if one paper cites another multiple times or lower if scite has not yet processed some of the citing articles.
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1007/s00268-019-05147-z

Supporting
Mentioning
Contrasting
1
12
0

Article citations


Go to all (6) article citations